The Trump administration took its hardest line yet to legalize anti-gay discrimination on Friday when it asked the Supreme Court to declare that federal law allows private companies to fire workers based only on their sexual orientation. Asked last week about his administration’s legal steps to make it easier to discriminate against LGBTQ people in the workplace, Trump sidestepped the question, touting his recent endorsement by.
With the U.S. Supreme Court poised to issue a major ruling on whether firing workers for being gay, lesbian and bisexual is legal under federal civil rights law, the Trump administration has weighed in with its view: Fire away.
The Trump administration Friday filed a brief with the Supreme Court arguing that gay workers are not protected by federal civil rights law. The filing came exactly one week after the. Today’s decision comes as a judicial defeat over the Trump administration, which argued against the gay worker in the case and issued an unsolicited court briefing in arguing that the.
For example:. The Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in all three Title VII cases — two on sexual orientation and one on gender identity — on Oct. This latest brief, submitted by Solicitor General Noel J. This is a sad day, and the implications will reverberate for years and across the country, but it does not shake our resolve to continue fighting.
Clayton County6 which interpreted sex discrimination to include discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation and gender identity. Contents Download Share. Protections from discrimination and harassment based on sexual orientation and gender identity provided by executive orders are important to hundreds of thousands of LGBTQ federal employees and employees of federal contractors and subcontractors.
Sundowner Offshore Services, Inc. One of the gay rights cases currently at issue before the Supreme Court is Bostock v. For an optimal experience visit our site on another browser.
Lacy argued that the law violates the Equal Protection rights of transgender adolescents. We can, and must, show up for trans youth in the courts and in our communities. Make no mistake, gender-affirming care is often life-saving care, and all major medical associations have determined it to be safe, appropriate, and effective. Search Search.
Tell your members of Congress to protect trans people from discrimination today. And in October — prior to the Supreme Court decision to hear the Stephens case — the Justice Department filed a brief with the high court siding with the funeral home. Yet inthe Obama administration arguably dialed back its opposition by not trying to dismiss a case brought on those grounds.
Conclusion Protections from discrimination and harassment based on sexual orientation and gender identity provided by executive orders are important to hundreds of thousands of LGBTQ federal employees and employees of federal contractors and subcontractors. Most LGBTQ employees have multiple marginalized identities because of their race, sex, gender, religion, disability status, and other personal characteristics.
The Trump administration filed an amicus trump asks to fire workers for being gay in the Stephens case Aug. Copy link Facebook Twitter LinkedIn. The Trump administration took its hardest line yet to legalize anti-gay discrimination on Friday when it asked the Supreme Court to declare that federal law allows private companies to fire workers based only on their sexual orientation.
Related Content. No significant facts have been changed or added. NBC News Logo. Circuit Court of Appeals in the Zarda case opposing the extension of Title VII discrimination protections on the basis of sexual orientation. In addition, West Virginia v. Executive Order was issued by President Johnson in and has been amended over time to prohibit discrimination on the basis of race, religion, sex, and national origin, as well as sexual orientation and gender identity.
In Julythe Department of Justice submitted an amicus brief with the 2nd U.
Copyright ©itether.pages.dev 2025